G-NET II

Vio Mobile Video Contertor
NEW! Go mobile and watch your media on your mobile device with our Free Media Converter.
Click here!

G-Net II: MATH, QUANTUM PHY, Sci & Tech, ; Internet2; Windows 7, Windows 2008 Features/Futures; Longhorn Testing; DEBIAN and LINUX DISTROS; Software; Hardware; Virtualware; Steamware (Vaporware); WEB 2.0 & WEB 3.0; WIFI and SNORT; "Wikipedia 3.0: The End of Google?"; ITC; Kultur; Olds an News; (PR, PR, AR and UE) € or WC Focus; Crude/Brent $Bill Focus; Trick; Lie; "(In)Correct Politics Will Be GET OUT", Cheese Politics, Parliamentary Democracy Constitutional Bla Bla Bla, Soul States and Potato Principia "Experimental Edition"


It's a Cool TTF Font: 'Bradley Hand ITC' Install the Cool TTF Font: 'Bradley Hand ITC'   --->>>   http://spazioinwind.libero.it/standupforjamaica/Files/Bradhitc.exe Do You Like It? Get It This TTF Link Here! Rachmaninov Variations on a Theme by Corelli, Op.42   ------->>>   http://www.youtube.com/v/5sATkIrvoLQ&rel=1   


MUSIC BOX I

Quinta-feira, Agosto 25, 2005

By The Way! What's EPR Paradox? (again) 

Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen Paradox EPR Paradox From Wikipedia EPR Paradox - Psych Central EPR paradox-Algebra.com EPR paradox on Answers.com / Wikipedia Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox The Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox and its solution The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Photons Uncertainty Removes Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox In quantum mechanics, the EPR paradox is a thought experiment which demonstrates that the result of a measurement performed on one part of a quantum system can have an instantaneous effect on the result of a measurement performed on another part, regardless of the distance separating the two parts. This runs counter to the intuition of special relativity, which states that information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light. "EPR" stands for Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, who introduced the thought experiment in a 1935 paper to argue that quantum mechanics is not a complete physical theory. It is sometimes referred to as the EPRB paradox for David Bohm, who converted the original thought experiment into something closer to being experimentally testable. The EPR paradox is a paradox in the following sense: if one takes quantum mechanics and adds some seemingly reasonable conditions (referred to as "locality", "realism", and "completeness"), then one obtains a contradiction. However, quantum mechanics by itself does not appear to be internally inconsistent, nor -- as it turns out -- does it contradict relativity. As a result of further theoretical and experimental developments since the original EPR paper, most physicists today regard the EPR paradox as an illustration of how quantum mechanics violates classical intuitions, and not as an indication that quantum mechanics is fundamentally flawed. How To Compreensive EPR see: Exterior algebra, wedge products, exterior derivatives, differential forms, de Rham and Alexander-Spanier cohomology, integration on manifolds, Gauge Group and Gauge Theory, Bell's Theorem, Hilbert space, Pauli matrices, Lie algebra, Poincare group, Gell-Mann matrices, Lorentz group, Quantum information Does Bell's Inequality Principle rule out local theories of quantum mechanics? on Usenet Physics FAQ

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Locations of visitors to this page
Archives

MUSIC BOX II

G-NET II ©2009